Thursday, October 11, 2007

Retrieval 2

Oct 8th

The electricity failed soon after the GC run was initiated (and we had left) on Friday afternoon. As described to me by Cheikh, the incoming grid electricity is of poor condition and the UPS uses battery power to compensate thus draining the UPS batteries. When the batteries are drained the grid power is insufficient to maintain the equipment and the UPS shuts down. The backup generator does not turn on because it still recognizes the grid power input regardless of quality.

Therefore, we have no data from last week’s extraction.

We are attempting to run the GC entirely off the backup generator while we are in Saint Louis in hopes that the clean signal from the generator will allow the GC to complete its run.

I am of the opinion that CERES needs a power conditioning unit to prevent abuse of the UPS and maintain instrument operation. Or a replacement UPS that is capable of better power conditioning.

Seraphim Dorego joined us to perform GIS work at the site then we left for St. Louis about 2:30 pm.

Oct 9th

We arrived at Site 1 at about 8:15 and proceeded to retrieve two sets of PSDs, one set for CERES extraction and analysis and one set for OSU extraction and analysis. CERES staff in attendance were: Cheikh, Makhfousse, Anna, Marie, Adama, Sokhna, Madame Ndaiye. Abdoulaye Djiop again assisted with retrieval. CERES staff performed all work with minimal oversight and field bench sheets were competed in detail.

When we approached Site 1 we found the cages were lying horizontally on the bottom of the concrete canal. The PSD had significant fouling, but some may be rust from the non-stainless steel portions of the cages.

An interesting observation of the PSD is the increasing amount of fouling with increasing distance from the river. Site 3 cages are positioned in the Goron-Lamspar tributary and are very clean after two weeks, Site 2 in the main irrigation canal shows some fouling, while Site 1 at the drainage pump station shows the most severe fouling. It is not clear, however, if the fouling is rust, sediment, or biological.

From left to right: Site 3 in the river, Site 2 in the irrigation canal,

and Site 1 at the drainage pumping station.

In addition to the four PSD sites, we visited the drainage area south of the pumping station to allow Seraphim to collect GIS data. We observed livestock drinking at this site.

We observed bathing, washing of utensils and household water collection, as well as fishing at Site 1, and household water collection at Sites 2 and 3.


October 10th


We left St. Louis too late to get back to Dakar early enough to perform the PSD cleaning, but we received word that the GC had successfully run all the loaded samples.

1 comment:

KAA said...

Power (appropriate quality) is essential to productivity for any laboratory. Just a thought how about solar panels that provide a trickle charge back to the batteries?